A Policy for Jobless Youth in South Africa

Wage subsidies create jobs. At least, this is what the South African Government believed would help solve the country’s 40 percent youth unemployment crisis. Youth unemployment in South Africa has remained critically high for over a decade, affecting more than 40% of young people. In response, the Government introduced the Employment Tax Incentive (ETI) in 2014. This policy was designed to reduce the cost of hiring young workers by offering companies a wage subsidy if they employed people aged 18–29 earning below R6 000 per month.

The ETI allows employers to claim back up to 50% of a young worker’s monthly wage as a tax credit. The full subsidy is available for workers earning between R2 000 and R4 000. The amount decreases if the worker earns above R4 000, and no subsidy is given if wages go above R6 000. The subsidy lasts for 24 months. The policy excludes public sector jobs and applies only to new hires. Its goal is to create formal work opportunities and give young people work experience that may help them stay employed in the future.

The study investigated the effects of this significant payroll tax credit for young, low-wage workers in South Africa. Researchers used survey data from the Quarterly Labour Force Survey (QLFS) and anonymised tax data from the National Treasury to examine employment, unemployment, earnings, and job duration. The goal was to find out whether eligible young workers had better job outcomes compared to similar groups after the policy began.

The study employed a method known as triple differences (DDD) to assess the impact of the ETI on the eligible group. The DDD method calculates the effect by comparing three distinct groups, this helps isolate the true effect of the ETI from other factors that may have impacted youth or low-wage workers in general.

Group 1

Young, low-wage workers who are eligible for the tax credit.

Group 2

Older, low-wage workers aged 30 to 35.

Group 3

Young, higher-wage workers earning between R6 000 and R9 000.

Results Based on Triple Difference Analysis:

Outcome

Noted Change

Employment increase

+1.2% (not significant)

Unemployment drop (all youth)

–4.9% (significant)

Job entry increase

+0.7% (significant)

Job duration over 12 months

+1.4%

Earnings increase (men only)

+4%

Earnings increase (women)

None

The ETI had different effects for men and women. For women, unemployment fell sharply, and employment increased significantly. For men, there was no increase in jobs, but their earnings rose. This suggests that part of the subsidy may have gone into wages rather than job creation. The biggest positive effects were found in women aged 25–29. In contrast, the youngest men (18–24) did not benefit much from the programme.

Gender-Based Impact of the ETI:

Group

Employment Change

Earnings Change

Women

+4.1%

No increase

Men

–3.3%

+4.0%

Youth 25–29

+5.4%

Higher than average

Youth 18–24

–3.2%

Little to no gain

The biggest employment entry gains were seen in workers earning R2 001–R4 000, where the subsidy is highest. Job exits decreased slightly for workers earning under R2 000. Wage gains were largest at the R2 000 level, suggesting that firms may have adjusted salaries to match subsidy cut-offs.

The ETI succeeded in helping some groups, especially young women and low-wage earners, but it did not lead to a general rise in youth employment. The policy also caused employers to adjust wages to maximise the subsidy, rather than create new jobs. By 2018, about 10% of formal jobs were supported by ETI, but these jobs only made up 2% of total wages in the economy.

Even though the cost of the policy was over R3.7 billion per year, the overall employment impact was low. However, the policy did improve earnings and job duration for some low-income workers.

The Employment Tax Incentive has not solved youth unemployment, but it has helped certain groups. It worked best for women, those earning around R2 000–R4 000, and in sectors such as retail and agriculture. For future success, wage subsidies may need to be combined with training, stronger enforcement, or targeted support.